Sanja
Phoenix, United States
|
If it takes two weeks to inspect, then may be I'd rather go elsewhere...:unsure:
|
|
|
Hi Sanja,
Your pictures would be up in a day or two, if they are approved.
Thanks,
Josh
|
Sanja
Phoenix, United States
|
Yes, my images were reviewed, thank you, but I do not really understand some of the comments.
Of course, that's the learning curve for me, since I am new here.
For example, one of the images is "out of focus" - while in fact, the animal's face is very sharp so you can see each tiny detail. Only closest foreground and background are out focus - but that's normal and that's intentional. So not really sure if this is a correct judgment.
Regarding "over/underexposed" - again, disagree. These files were made from raw, so the exposure was adjusted just right, to dramatize the colors. But may be the monitor of the reviewer was not calibrated correctly, so they appeared too dark.
|
|
|
I agree, we have sent numerous photos that where selective focus but they were rejected with the "out of focus" reason.
|
|
|
Was that photo of the animal in focus at 100%? Sometimes I could swear looking at something, it will be sharp but at 100%, it is not. Going through my pictures at 100%, some of mine are almost in focus but not perfect. Other stock agencies would except them, but Crestock has a high guidelines because they want their clients to get the best when purchasing their images. It puts them above other agencies.
|
Sanja
Phoenix, United States
|
In this case, the eyes and face of the animal are very sharp, and the insignificant details, such as leaves, were intentionally put out of focus.
Before I downloaded my photo, I looked at your stock of similar images. Mine is, actually, better, otherwise, I wouldn't even bother to submit.
|